'See one, do one' is a weekly column in the BMJ based on life as a junior doctor. A lot of the time it's written by doctors with at least one or two years experience but occasionally it's written by a first year doctor and these entries are the ones which I relate to the most. This week's submission relates to the problem which arises when there is lack of clarity over the team looking after a patient due to lack of communication following transfer from wards. When this happens, I think that the ward based junior doctor should always take responsibility to be up-to-date with which consultant is looking after the patient and while I sympathise with the situation, I think that the consultants and the junior doctors share responsibility in ensuring that patients are seen by the relevant team every day. I think that having ward based junior doctors is much preferable to having team based doctors to prevent the problems of patients being 'missed' from occurring.
Carrying on with communication, in Glasgow there's a thriving multinational community and often this poses significant language barriers when patients are admitted for urgent medical treatment. On a few occasions it's been difficult to gain access to either a translator or a relative who speaks the language required at short notice. Des Spence is a GP in Glasgow who writes a weekly column in the BMJ. This week he talks about this problem. "Having an 8 year old boy translating in a consultation about his mother's mood is less than ideal" is very true! Interestingly, Dr Spence uses Google translate with his patients - I've never come across this before but it sounds like a good idea. When there is a third party in a consultation, such as a translator, there can be an effect on the dynamics of a consultation. For example information can be mistranslated and frank discussions can be difficult. I can't think of an easy solution to this problem but perhaps more of a mobile phone or on-line based translation service would be preferable.
Finally, there is an article in this month's BMJ on the topic of doctors' use of social media and networking sites. This topic has received a lot of attention over the past 5 years since the massive increase of the use of on-line networking. From personal experience, I'd say all junior doctors use email, nearly everyone has Facebook and a probably a smaller proportion use online discussion based websites. I don't think that there should be restrictions on doctors using online websites however I think that people need to be sensible about what they post. Discussing clinical cases where a patient may be identifiable is obviously very unprofessional. I think it's a good idea that the BMA has published guidance on what can and cannot be posted online because it shows awareness of the issue, however I don't think that there should be restrictions on doctors liberties or even worse - regulation over doctors lives outside of work - heaven forbid!